Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:51:49 -0500 From: Bart Silverstrim <bsilver@chrononomicon.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... Message-ID: <3689589ceb0c4136e92d14c65c5df940@chrononomicon.com> In-Reply-To: <823306184.20050212113045@wanadoo.fr> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050211122632.99069G-100000@fledge.watson.org> <1935025570.20050211232605@wanadoo.fr> <dcb2c27a05021200582c5750c1@mail.gmail.com> <200502120122.33589.reso3w83@verizon.net> <823306184.20050212113045@wanadoo.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 12, 2005, at 5:30 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Michael C. Shultz writes: > >> I Agree! My FreeBSD desktop is very stable and user friendly. What >> ever time I spend fixing/managing desktops is on my friends windows >> machines, never my own because it always just works. > > Maybe you can explain to me how to get the following applications to > run > on a FreeBSD desktop: > > Adobe Photoshop > Adobe Illustrator > Quark XPress > The Sims 2 <snip> I never quite liked these arguments. The question to ask is, "What can I use for graphics editing on platform X? What can I use for desktop publishing on platform Y?". Otherwise, it's like saying, "Explain how I can get a Ford from Chevrolet?" Not everyone absolutely needs Photoshop to edit their family Xmas digicam pictures. -Bart
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3689589ceb0c4136e92d14c65c5df940>