Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 11 Jan 1999 16:59:44 -0700
From:      Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
To:        Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Cc:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, dervish@bantu.cl.msu.edu, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: What are the advantages of ELF kernels?
Message-ID:  <369A9070.F9DCC718@softweyr.com>
References:  <199901112152.NAA25190@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Steve Kargl wrote:
> 
> According to Matthew Dillon:
> >
> >     But, most importantly, there has been a general trend towards ELF in the
> >     last decade and getting on that bandwagon is important, especially if we
> >     want to maintain native compatibility with Linux and other operating
> >     systems.  The importance of maintaining compatibility cannot be
> >     underestimated.
> 
> Actually, hasn't FSF dropped support/development of a.out tools.
> So, if FreeBSD wants to continue to use FSF compiler technology,
> then we are compelled to move forward to ELF.

And that is the strongest reason to move to ELF: because everyone else did.

Being able to keep up with other developments in the world of development
tools, not becoming a backwater, is an important point.  This will allow
FreeBSD to be a first-class Ada development system, using GNATS.  ;^)

-- 
             Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?

Wes Peters                                                     +1.801.915.2061
Softweyr LLC                                                  wes@softweyr.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?369A9070.F9DCC718>