Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 11:29:28 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= <andreas.faerber@web.de> To: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, Mikolaj Kucharski <mikolaj@kucharski.name>, Enache Adrian <3n4ch3@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Thanx for the kqemu patches; some notes about NetBSD/OpenBSD guests Message-ID: <38008E46-FD5F-4992-A824-E7F5CFBD5475@web.de> In-Reply-To: <20090530205152.GA7702@triton.kn-bremen.de> References: <20090530205152.GA7702@triton.kn-bremen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi J=FCrgen, Am 30.05.2009 um 22:51 schrieb Juergen Lock: > I just committed Jan's kqemu patch series to the FreeBSD kqemu port > (yes FreeBSD is another one of those `left behind' OSes where kvm > doesn't really work yet...) - and I also committed an old NetBSD/=20 > OpenBSD > guest kqemu patch, > = http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2007-11/msg00125.html > and then played with a NetBSD guest in qemu 0.10.5 a little, where I > found out a few things: > > 1. A few times I even got NetBSD 5.0/i386 running with -kernel-kqemu =20= > now, > tho a few other times I also got guest processes segfaulting etc. > `Regualr' kqemu seems stable now tho. Thanks for the pointer. I've pushed it to a pick-up branch for now to =20= facilitate testing. Did you test non-BSD guests, too? I noticed that Adrian has patches for OpenBSD host support in their =20 ports CVS repository, as pointed out by Mikolaj. There appears to be some FreeBSD code in-tree though - so, is the =20 above patch the only one you've queued, or do you have host patches as =20= well that we could push "upstream"? Regards, Andreas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38008E46-FD5F-4992-A824-E7F5CFBD5475>