Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:38:27 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Cc: gabor@t-hosting.hu Subject: Re: linux_base-fc4 installing in the wrong path Message-ID: <38602428@srv.sem.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <60042918@srv.sem.ipt.ru> (Boris Samorodov's message of "Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:30:17 %2B0400") References: <200606230924.48350.consumidor@mundinho.com.br> <449BE4FC.5040700@FreeBSD.org> <60042918@srv.sem.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:30:17 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:56:28 +0200 Gábor Kövesdán wrote: > > consumidor wrote: > > > gentlemen: > > > > > > my port of linux_base-fc4 is installing all binaries, libs etc in > > > /usr/local. at the end of the install it "brands" all my binaries in > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [1] > > > /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/sbin, so my applications become > > > unusable. It also installs libc.so.6 on /usr/local/lib, breaking a > > > lot of stuff. I googled for hours, to no avail. Would you please > > > help me on getting this done right? I mean, I presume it should be > > > installed on /usr/compat/linux > > > > > It installs right except when you override PREFIX or LINUXBASE. Make > > sure you don't have anything wrong in /etc/make.conf. > That's true. And [1] shouldn't happen anyway. We do branding at WRKSRC > and only then do the installation (for more information look at > bsd.linux-rpm.mk). Oops! This is a base port and doesn't use bsd.linux-rpm.mk. And we really do install and then do the branding. Seems that it should be vice versa to not allow someone to shoot the foot. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38602428>