Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 14 Feb 2000 15:43:19 +0200
From:      Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@altavista.net>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        Ben Smithurst <ben@scientia.demon.co.uk>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: timed/adjtime() on -current
Message-ID:  <38A80676.DD50DA8D@altavista.net>
References:  <9929.950432964@critter.freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

> Anyway: Don't used timed, use ntpd.

Why? As long as the timed is in the base system and serves the basic need to
syncronise time across several machines in the LAN I do not see any objections to
not use it. Its main advantage that it's permit updating time via ntpdate (the
thing that xntpd doesn't allow to do) which is particularly useful for dial-up
connections.

-Maxim




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38A80676.DD50DA8D>