Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 15:43:19 +0200 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@altavista.net> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Ben Smithurst <ben@scientia.demon.co.uk>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: timed/adjtime() on -current Message-ID: <38A80676.DD50DA8D@altavista.net> References: <9929.950432964@critter.freebsd.dk>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Anyway: Don't used timed, use ntpd. Why? As long as the timed is in the base system and serves the basic need to syncronise time across several machines in the LAN I do not see any objections to not use it. Its main advantage that it's permit updating time via ntpdate (the thing that xntpd doesn't allow to do) which is particularly useful for dial-up connections. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the messagehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38A80676.DD50DA8D>