Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 00:57:20 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> Cc: Gerhard Sittig <Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linksys Etherfast.. broken? Message-ID: <3A8E3CF0.7DEF9B5F@elischer.org> References: <3A8E0D9C.261A0259@elischer.org> <3A896E33.8AC84353@elischer.org> <3A89C231.D03793D4@westmarsh.com> <20010214211548.B15618@speedy.gsinet> <20010216211610.B20830@speedy.gsinet> <200102170700.f1H70rW84857@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <3A8E0D9C.261A0259@elischer.org> Julian Elischer writes:
> : It looks to me like the interrupt vector is not being registered..
> : I'll try figut out what I've screwed up in the config.
>
> timeouts usually mean one of two things. With ed devices, they could
> be the new dlink based chips (fa-410, dlink etherfast, some linksys
> card) or you have a bad IRQ configured that another hunk of hardware
> is driving.
the thing that pisses me of is that this card DID WORK!
I tried the fa_select program.. it didn't help.
Msmith showed a proram once that showed the interrupt registrations
but I can't find it any more.
It's hard to see whether it registred the handler or not.
The other interrupt from the pccard bus is shouwn twice in vmstat -i
stray irq0 1 0
stray irq10 1 0 <------
ata0 irq14 9610 2
atkbd0 irq1 7364 1
psm0 irq12 98250 21
clk irq0 452252 99
sio1 irq10 112125 24 <-------
I don't quite understand how the pccard and card-bus are connected:
the dmesg says
pcic-pci0: <TI PCI-1225 PCI-CardBus Bridge> at device 4.0 on pci0
pcic-pci0: TI12XX PCI Config Reg: [ring enable][speaker enable][pwr save][FUNC p
ci int + CSC serial isa irq]
pcic-pci0: Legacy address set to 0x3e0
PCI Config space:
======= etc.
pcic0: <VLSI 82C146> at port 0x3e0 iomem 0xd0000 on isa0
pcic0: Polling mode
stat is 7f
stat is 7f
pccard0: <PC Card bus -- kludge version> on pcic0
pccard1: <PC Card bus -- kludge version> on pcic0
=====
sio-: sio0 already exists, using sio1 instead
pcic: I/O win 0 flags 11 2e8-2ef
pcic: I/O win 0 flags 1 2e8-2ef
sio1 at port 0x2e8-0x2ef irq 10 slot 0 on pccard0
pcic: I/O win 0 flags 11 2e8-2ef
sio1: type 16550A
/dev/vmmon: Module vmmon: registered with major=200 minor=0 tag=$Name: build-364
$
/dev/vmmon: Module vmmon: initialized
bpf: vmnet1 attached
pcic: I/O win 0 flags 15 300-31f
pcic: I/O win 0 flags 5 300-31f
ed0 at port 0x300-0x31f irq 11 slot 1 on pccard1
pcic: I/O win 0 flags 15 300-31f
bpf: ed0 attached
ed0: address 00:e0:98:74:49:0d, type Linksys (16 bit)
pid 288 (Xaccel): trap 12 with interrupts disabled
bpf: ng0 attached
========
so it looks like the TI chip is emulating the VLSI 82C146..
is that correct?
..
If anyone has an inspiron running -current that can run
an ed based ethernet card (on the top slot)
(especially a linksys etherfast,) I'd love to see
your configs and the /boot/device.hints files you are using..
>
> The interrupt vector almost certainly is getting registered. It just
> isn't being called.
>
> Warner
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
--
__--_|\ Julian Elischer
/ \ julian@elischer.org
( OZ ) World tour 2000-2001
---> X_.---._/
v
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A8E3CF0.7DEF9B5F>