Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 21:02:06 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Peter Seebach <seebs@plethora.net>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Setting memory allocators for library functions. Message-ID: <3A98F43E.FFC99867@newsguy.com> References: <200102242037.f1OKbd618343@guild.plethora.net> <xzp7l2f7qy2.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > > None of these solutions are portable, however; > > Well, no, but the sole available definition of "portable" says that it is > > "portable" to assume that all the memory malloc can return is really > > available. > > Show me a modern OS (excluding real-time and/or embedded OSes) that > makes this guarantee. Solaris and AIX (on AIX this is optional on a global or per-application level). -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@kzinti.bsdconspiracy.net Acabou o hipismo-arte. Mas a desculpa brasileira mais ouvida em Sydney e' que nao tem mais cavalo bobo por ai'. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A98F43E.FFC99867>