Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:18:22 -0500 From: Jim Bryant <kc5vdj@yahoo.com> To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: oddity with dump(8) or sa(4) in -current Message-ID: <3B4E3E4E.8C698F3A@yahoo.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0107121656450.61694-100000@beppo>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
I'm running -current from last night or the night before.
Plus because of the recent changes to the filesystem structure, I deleted /usr/src/sys and re-cvsupped it.
* $FreeBSD: src/sys/cam/scsi/scsi_sa.c,v 1.75 2001/07/04 05:22:42 mjacob Exp $
^^^^
Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> This patched against -current for me, so I haven't a clue as to what you're
> actually running.
>
> Are you running -current or -stable? If -stable, ignore what I said about
> Joerg's changes. The -stable could should, in fact, be working. I went through
> a 8 week test cycle with some guy who had a similar problem with his DDS3, but
> I never *could* reproduce it.
>
> -matt
>
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Jim Bryant wrote:
>
> > 6:43:21pm wahoo(123): patch </home/jbryant/scsi_sa.c.patch
> > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
> > The text leading up to this was:
> > --------------------------
> > |Index: scsi_sa.c
> > |===================================================================
> > |RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/cam/scsi/scsi_sa.c,v
> > |retrieving revision 1.68
> > |retrieving revision 1.67
> > |diff -u -r1.68 -r1.67
> > |--- scsi_sa.c 2001/04/22 20:13:28 1.68
> > |+++ scsi_sa.c 2001/03/27 05:45:12 1.67
> > --------------------------
> > Patching file scsi_sa.c using Plan A...
> > Hunk #1 failed at 2286.
> > 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to scsi_sa.c.rej
> > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
> > The text leading up to this was:
> > --------------------------
> > | periph = xpt_path_periph(ccb->ccb_h.path);
> > | softc = (struct sa_softc *)periph->softc;
> > --------------------------
> > File to patch: scsi_sa.c
> > Patching file scsi_sa.c using Plan A...
> > Hunk #1 failed at 2396.
> > Hunk #2 failed at 2424.
> > Hunk #3 failed at 2438.
> > 3 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to scsi_sa.c.rej
> > done
> >
> > Matthew Jacob wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Jim Bryant wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well, honestly, the last working version I had was late feb/early-march,
> > > > at which point i lost my connectivity. Then I had a cmos battery go bad
> > > > without the settings being written, this caused an IRQ conflict which I
> > > > only resolved a few days ago. They say "shit happens", well, I had a
> > > > whole manure truck dump on me over the past few months, and I'm only now
> > > > getting my shit together.
> > > >
> > > > All I can say is that it worked late-feb/early-march.
> > >
> > > Try the attached patch, which backs Joerg's fix in rev 1.68.
> > >
> > > -matt
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Name: sapatch
> > > sapatch Type: Plain Text (TEXT/PLAIN)
> > > Encoding: BASE64
jim
--
ET has one helluva sense of humor!
He's always anal-probing right-wing schizos!
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B4E3E4E.8C698F3A>