Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:17:25 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Message-ID: <3B55C4A5.2CD5B05A@mindspring.com> References: <20010716013127.A16058@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010716103351.A81876@walton.maths.tcd.ie> <20010716031932.A5930@xor.obsecurity.org> <p05101004b77a150da1f1@[128.113.24.47]> <20010717094027.A78232@xor.obsecurity.org> <p05101007b77a2351f9de@[128.113.24.47]> <20010717102713.A79329@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010718002343.A30891@nagual.pp.ru> <3B55B5E6.7D3659BD@mindspring.com> <3B55BAA6.79E9B9FD@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > I vote this too. We don't need stripped down libreadline under > > > 'libreadline' name pretend to be full version (f.e. for autoconf, etc.) > > > > The cryptography libraries have set a precedent here. I > > could argue the same thing about the presence of a full DES > > in libcrypt. > > I failed to understand what you are trying to say. Do you mean that we have > to follow a bad practice set by that precedent at any costs, or I parsed your > message incorrectly? I'm saying "fix it both places, or it obviously is not a sufficient justification for a decision". Or to put it another way "if you are willing to live with it in one place, why not two?". -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B55C4A5.2CD5B05A>