Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 10:49:54 -0400 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> To: Johann Visagie <johann@egenetics.com> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/biology/p5-bioperl-devel Makefile ports/biology/p5-bioperl-devel/files Makefile.man Message-ID: <3B80EB52.27094.569AE2E@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20010820161028.G67741@fling.sanbi.ac.za> References: <3B80D46A.3260.51031F7@localhost>; from dan@langille.org on Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 09:12:10AM -0400
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20 Aug 2001, at 16:10, Johann Visagie wrote:
> Dan Langille on 2001-08-20 (Mon) at 09:12:10 -0400:
> >
> > Any reason not to call it Makefile.inc ? I've seen that used many
> > times before.
>
> No particular reason, except that I was copying what was done to
> security/heimdal in this case and didn't engage the brain to think up a
> filename of my own. :-)
>
> I've used Makefile.inc myself in the past, but I don't think there's a
> particular rule involved here(?)
>
> One thing, though: I put my Makefile.man in ${FILESDIR} - I thought that was
> neater.
OK....
[imagine me going to FreshPorts to add Makefile.man to the list of
special files]
--
Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited
FreshPorts - http://freshports.org/ - the place for ports
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B80EB52.27094.569AE2E>