Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Nov 2001 23:10:03 -0500
From:      Sergey Babkin <babkin@bellatlantic.net>
To:        mjacob@feral.com
Cc:        babkin@FreeBSD.org, Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/cam/scsi scsi_da.c
Message-ID:  <3BF9D79B.4BFB72D1@bellatlantic.net>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111191920520.69741-100000@beppo>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Jacob wrote:
> 
> > >
> > > The MO drives that I've used (these old 1.3GB disks) were nowhere
> > > that slow. The speed like of a 10-year-old hard disk can be expected
> > > from them. So I'd say that 5 minutes is a large overkill, something
> > > like 5 seconds would be more appropriate. Of course unless this
> > > particular model has a very large write chache.
> >
> > Or autofixate.
> 
> Skip that- I don't know what I was thinking.

Hm, do you imply the WORM disks ? I had no experience with these,
I've used only the rewritable MO disks.
 
> I was recalling that the tahiti maxoptix drive would periodically go away for
> a while- maybe a laser recal.

My experience was with Maxoptix and HP drives (on SCO UNIX
and HP-UX) and I don't remember anything like this. Though maybe
I just forgot something. I don't even think that they had a
long delay on read errors - instead they just returned the corrupted
data.

-SB

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3BF9D79B.4BFB72D1>