Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 20:35:51 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kernel Thread scheduler Message-ID: <3BFDD227.8F9A9540@mindspring.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111221250300.44466-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote: > > Interstingly only about 4 people downloaded all 7 pictures. > (according to the logs).. This is a bit disappointing. > Quite a few more looked at the first one, and then didn;t bother with the > rest.. I wonder if they had problems with it? was it impossible to look at > them for some people? Should I have done something different with them? > Or maybe the topic of shecduling thasks with multiple threads is just > boring :-) I am incredible disagreement about the idea of virtual processors (KSEG's), but then you know that from two years ago. It won't scale. There's no need to repeat everything ad infinitum, just because it's easier to implement. The resulting code is actually _less_ complex, though its conceptual complexity is higher. If you go don the virtual processor route, expect me to not ride in the bandwagon. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3BFDD227.8F9A9540>