Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 14:43:59 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: David Greenman <dg@root.com> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>, rsharpe@ns.aus.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Does anyone know if the Broadcom BCM5700 has problems with HW csum? Message-ID: <3C1BD22F.F3A52BF4@mindspring.com> References: <3C1AEA9E.6010502@ns.aus.com> <20011214214118.A30560@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <3C1AF362.534BD2F7@mindspring.com> <20011215005739.A84861@nexus.root.com> <20011215031304.N79896@elvis.mu.org> <20011215011045.C84861@nexus.root.com> <3C1B32EB.ACBA8DB@mindspring.com> <20011215135635.A86349@nexus.root.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Greenman wrote: > >In any case, disabling it is what ClickArray ended up doing, as well, > >for the Tigon II, until the firmware could be fixed. > > We're talking about the Tigon III (bge driver for Broadcom BCM5700/BCM5701). Crap. Thanks for the info. Have you manually calculated the checksum on a bad packet to see how it's off? PS: Is it -0 (0xFFFF)? Maybe they didn't use RFC 1936; maybe they used RFC 1141, which has a bug (RFC 1624 corrects the one's complement error of RFC 1141). -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C1BD22F.F3A52BF4>