Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:59:41 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> Cc: whoever <somebody@kashmir.etowns.net>, Mark Santcroos <marks@ripe.net>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ethernet tunnel device Message-ID: <3C6B0BFD.F27F040F@mindspring.com> References: <20020211032336.A2135@kashmir.etowns.net> <20020211170131.A79104@laptop.6bone.nl> <20020212074327.A3466@laptop.6bone.nl> <20020213111358.A3235@kashmir.etowns.net> <20020213111937.A10146@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brooks Davis wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:13:58AM -0800, whoever wrote: > > how come it gets lost in the vmware case and not in your simple app. > > also does ifconfig report that the vmnet device is opened by the pid > > of your app between open and close of the simple app? > > There's one difference between vmware and a little hacked up test app. > Linux emulation. It certaintly shouldn't matter, but it might be worth > compiling the test program on a linux machine and seeing it it leaves > the device in a weird state like vmware. Maybe it's losing an open instance in the resource track on close? That seems the most likely culprit... -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C6B0BFD.F27F040F>