Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Feb 2002 12:58:10 -0800
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
To:        Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
Cc:        sos@freebsd.dk, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Serverworks ATA controller & data corruption
Message-ID:  <3C740DE2.B028B5A5@mindspring.com>
References:  <15475.50753.252494.269972@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200202201953.g1KJrKq77437@freebsd.dk> <15476.1618.379112.915616@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> S=F8ren Schmidt writes:
>  > However the Serverworks
>  > ROSB4 chips is not one I would recommend using, if you need serious
>  > ATA support on such a board, install a Promise TX2 or later or a
>  > HPT370 or later ...
> =

> I don't much care about serious ATA support on these machines --

Apparently, neither does the chip vendor.  8-p.

> nearly all work is done on NFS volumes exported from an alpha.  If I
> can just trust PIO not to corrupt the system disk, then it will be
> fine for me.
> =

> So.. Is PIO safe?  Is there any sort of CRC being done on PIO data?

He just said: if your chipset is programmed correctly
by the BIOS, then there will not be a problem, but
apparently, there is a very narrow band of "correctly"
(perhaps even only a single state), and the vendor
apparently does not default the chip into that state.

FWIW, Julian had to fix a similar problem by programming
the heck out of a Cyrix MediaGX chipset via a custom
BIOS.

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C740DE2.B028B5A5>