Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 23:31:33 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann <oppermann@pipeline.ch> To: Christopher Weimann <cweimann@k12hq.com> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, Adrian Filipi-Martin <adrian@ubergeeks.com>, FreeBSD Hackers List <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: tuning a CPU bound server Message-ID: <3CEC0E35.26DBB385@pipeline.ch>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 12:52:09PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > > The problem is that as you maintain your patches, and the patch > > vendor maintains their patches, and DJB maintains his code, you > > end up with network effects. > > > > But DJB does't maintain his code. I don't think it he has touched > it in years. He maintains his code quite well. Thing is he only changes something if there is something to change. In the case of qmail-1.03 this means no change since 1998. Why? Simply because qmail-1.03 is essentially bugfree and works perfectly for it's intended purpose. I know because I spend the last five years writing and maintaining the qmail-ldap add-on and know the qmail code inside-out. Actually once you get used to it it's very nice and clean. > Otherwise you are of course correct :) -- Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3CEC0E35.26DBB385>