Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 16:17:20 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Daniel Blankensteiner <db@traceroute.dk> Cc: Gary Thorpe <gat7634@hotmail.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD daemon configurations redesign Message-ID: <3CF6B300.145E0CD9@mindspring.com> References: <F67gL6wxvw0IDT8zAJ90000d078@hotmail.com> <00c601c2082d$bc531ff0$6800a8c0@rafter>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Blankensteiner wrote: > From: "Gary Thorpe" <gat7634@hotmail.com> > > I do agree that making an /etc/daemon directory to store daemon > > configuration files is probably a good thing to do. A SysV-style init > would > > help with this though. Also, I am sure people will want to distinguish > > between 'core' daemons and user-added ones external to the base. > > I don't know anything about the SysV-style, but yes the core/base > daemons and the user/port daemons should be kept apart! If they weren't, then all daemons might as well be ports, have package registrations, and be easily replaceable and/or removable for small footprint installations. And without our bimonthly "why is sendmail there by default?" flame-fest, where would we be? -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3CF6B300.145E0CD9>