Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 13:43:47 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org> Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>, grog@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Do we still need portmap(8)? Message-ID: <3DA1F203.6CD50B5C@mindspring.com> References: <200210071735.g97HZokf056512@arch20m.dellroad.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Archie Cobbs wrote: > M. Warner Losh writes: > > : It's been a while since we've used portmap(8) on -CURRENT systems. Is > > : it still needed, or can it be removed completely? At the very least, > > : the man page should stop claiming that it's necessary to run NFS. > > > > I think that we need a mtree.obsolete that goes through and deletes > > these sorts of things as part of installworld/upgrade scripts. > > I totally agree.. I was thinking that mergemaster could have a > 'hit list' of files that can be been removed. How will this work for "perl", which is not removed, but is instead replaced with a stub shell script? I guess you can live with binaries linked against older versions of shared libraries suddenly not functioning... -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DA1F203.6CD50B5C>