Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 10:01:27 -0600 From: Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mike Schreckengost <mrpolitics@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.1-BETA2 install results Message-ID: <3ECCF457.4030901@btc.adaptec.com> In-Reply-To: <20030522155514.GA32442@sunbay.com> References: <20030522155514.GA32442@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 11:28:18AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > >>On 22-May-2003 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >> >>>On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 07:10:24PM -0400, Mike Schreckengost wrote: >>>[...] >>> >>>>I just performed a 'clean' install of 5.0-BETA2, and have > > encountered a few > >>>>issues which may (or may not!) be considered as 'bugs'. >>> >>>>Issues encountered: >>>> >>> >>>[...] >>> >>>>3) The 'krb5' and 'ports' distributions failed to install over FTP > > from > >>>>ftp://ftp5.FreeBSD.org. I noticed in a prior post to this list that > > the > >>>>krb5 distro was folded into 'crypto', which appears to be correct. > > However, > >>>>sysinstall still looks for 'krb5' separately and issues an error > > when it > >>>>can't be found. >>>> >>> >>>That's clearly still the case; attached is the patch. Please > > someone > >>>from re@ review and commit it. >> >>I have a similar patch already. However, there is the remaining issue > > of > >>the skrb5 distribution. If krb5 is going to be removed, skrb5 needs > > to > >>be fixed as well. >> > > While it may seem confusing at a glance, it's okay (skrb5). > Example: we don't provide "share" distribution, but we have > "sshare" source distribution. Similarly here, we don't > provide "krb5" distribution any more (it's part of the > "crypto" distribution), but we provide "skrb5" distribution, > in the same location as "scrypto" and "ssecure", in > ${CHROOTDIR}/R/ftp/crypto/. > I'd have to say that I'd rather not perpetuate the inconsistency. These kinds of things make the installer more and more obscure. > >>Also, have you tested a release with this patch? >> > > Since it only affects sysinstall(8), I just recompiled the > latter, and played with it for a bit on a running system. Great! John's patch looked a little more complete, maybe John can comment on that. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3ECCF457.4030901>