Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 14:20:28 -0600 From: Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com> To: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi> Cc: Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: raidframe Message-ID: <3EDA600C.90104@btc.adaptec.com> In-Reply-To: <00b501c32876$74502fd0$812a40c1@PETEX31> References: <3ED9E8AB.5060106@he.iki.fi> <20030601232426.A43338@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <00b501c32876$74502fd0$812a40c1@PETEX31>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Petri Helenius wrote: >>RAIDframe is non-functional in 5.1 and -current [kern/50541] and it would be >>unwise to use it in 5.0 for anything other than experimentation. Hopefully it >>will be fixed before 5.2. >> > > Makes one wonder how broken code ever got into the tree in the first place... > > Pete > Just settle down a bit. If you rewind to last October, RAIDFrame worked well. Unfortunately, some kernel interfaces changed in between now and then and RAIDFrame was left behind. I am remis in not fixing it, but please understand that I also have quite a few other responsibilities, and I get paid $0 to work on RAIDframe. As for hardware raid, what cards have you tried, and what problems have you experienced? You last message was jsut a shot in the dark that few of us would be able to help with. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EDA600C.90104>