Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 13:09:07 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jumbograms (& em) & nfs a no go Message-ID: <3FA420F3.35045EF6@mindspring.com> References: <20031029183808.M99053@prg.traveller.cz> <3FA223AB.797B2528@mindspring.com> <20031031175030.GB78910@pit.databus.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Barney Wolff wrote: > > Implies the sending host is not honoring the MTU restriction when > > deciding whether or not to frag packets. > > 67582 looks awfully bogus even as a pre-frag length. How could that come > over the wire? The sending host is not honoring the MTU restriction? 8-) 8-). Most likely, a direct call to ether_output, or a code path that results in fragmentation not being implemented; see my other post: it could be that he's using NFS over UDP, and that's doing it. -- Terry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FA420F3.35045EF6>