Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 22:53:50 -0500 From: Richard Coleman <richardcoleman@mindspring.com> To: "boyd, rounin" <boyd@insultant.net> Cc: kientzle@acm.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: /bin and /sbin are now dynamically linked Message-ID: <3FC02F4E.2090502@mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <028c01c3b170$c4fd6460$b9844051@insultant.net> References: <20031121010211.GD84421@saboteur.dek.spc.org><20031122.120100.16269141.imp@bsdimp.com><20031123112720.J3301@gamplex.bde.org> <20031122.184733.32325352.imp@bsdimp.com> <028c01c3b170$c4fd6460$b9844051@insultant.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
boyd, rounin wrote: > how about no copy of vi, or termcap and one copy of ed? Is this where we start swapping stories about "when I was a young sysadmin, we didn't need no stinkin vi. We used ed and liked it!". :-) Actually, as a sysadmin who's grown old, fat, and lazy, I would prefer to not need to use ed ever again. There's no need to be masochistic. Richard Coleman richardcoleman@mindspring.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FC02F4E.2090502>