Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 2 Dec 2007 07:31:20 +0100
From:      "Attilio Rao" <attilio@freebsd.org>
To:        "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: New "timeout" api, to replace callout
Message-ID:  <3bbf2fe10712012231p2945111cma2faed2299167d3a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <15391.1196547545@critter.freebsd.dk>
References:  <15391.1196547545@critter.freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2007/12/1, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>:
>
> Here is my proposed new timeout API for 8.x.
>
> The primary objective is to make it possible to have multiple timeout
> "providers" of possibly different kind, so that we can have per-cpu
> or per-net-stack timeout handing.

I have a question so.
Basically, do you plan to have in the so called "per-net-stack"
timeout group all these timeouts which doesn't necessarilly want to
benefit from CPU affinity?
I would expect a tcp callout, which wants to exploit CPU affinity, to
be in the "per-cpu0" group (0 is not a typo, it is expressing even on
what CPU to run). Is this your idea also?

I'm busy with my graduation process in these days, but I hope to came
back to you with a better review of this header in a couple of days.

Thanks,
Attilio


-- 
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3bbf2fe10712012231p2945111cma2faed2299167d3a>