Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:49:54 -0700
From:      Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
To:        Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
Cc:        "van Rooij, Guido" <Guido.vanRooij@nl.origin-it.com>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Microsoft go it right ;-)
Message-ID:  <4.2.2.20000117134916.019f97a0@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001172036250.17434-100000@dogma.freebsd-uk. eu.org>
References:  <4.2.2.20000117131053.019b3d30@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 01:37 PM 1/17/2000 , Jonathon McKitrick wrote:

>Could this simply be attributed to the explorer code being more tightly
>linked to the OS?  And M$ knowing all the back doors to squeeze
>performance out of their own OS system calls?

No; it's the SERVER that responds more slowly. I've watched on a
network monitor.

--Brett



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.2.20000117134916.019f97a0>