Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Jun 2000 07:45:22 -0700
From:      Lucas Silacci <lucas@san.rr.com>
To:        Nitebirdz <nitebirdz@uswest.net>
Cc:        Hyun Gu Kang <hyungukang@yahoo.com>, newbies@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: using a proxy server
Message-ID:  <4.3.1.0.20000614073627.00a959c0@pop-server.san.rr.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006130949060.5975-100000@coimbra.oss.uswest .net>
References:  <4.3.1.2.20000611145125.00aa88b0@ews.uiuc.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> >
> > If anyone has used VMware (virtual machine-can emulate your computer on 
> top
> > of your OS so you can run multiple OS at the same time)?  Do you think it
> > would be possible to somehow install it and run W98 on top of it and run
> > that proxy client program to be able to connect to the internet?
> >
>
>Why don't you try getting an old 486, installing FreeBSD on it and setting
>it up as an internet gateway to use instead the Win98 box?  I understand
>you're leaving the place soon, but if it works I see no reason why your
>roommates should oppose it... and it certainly does rock on FreeBSD.  Just
>an idea.


I second this motion!  I just helped a friend setup a private LAN with only 
windoze 98 boxes.  We attempted to use WinGate, but that failed miserably 
when we tried to install the client piece on each of the boxes.  We finally 
got the thing working after ripping out WinGate and installing WinProxy 
instead (that does not require any software installed on the clients), but 
the whole thing took us six hours to complete (most of that being reboots 
all over the place!).  I tried to convince my friend to get another box and 
install FreeBSD on it, but he didn't want to invest the time or money on 
it, plus he's not UNIX-savvy so the learning curve probably would have been 
a little steep.

Anyway, if you don't want to go the FreeBSD route, then I recommend you try 
and use WinProxy instead of WinGate because it doesn't require any software 
on the clients and therefore any box you want to install behind the server 
should work (Win, MAC, or *NIX).  The only thing I wonder about is the 
performance the server (or clients) will see using something like that on 
Win boxes.  Seems like Windows has enough problems loading the GUI 
sometimes, let alone doing NAT for 4 other windows boxes....

-Lucas
--
"All that we see or seem
Is but a dream within a dream." -- Edgar Allan Poe

Lucas Silacci			
lucas@san.rr.com		lucas.silacci@sandiegoca.ncr.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-newbies" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.1.0.20000614073627.00a959c0>