Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 20:31:52 -0700 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr> Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bystander shot by a spam filter Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20030104202908.03c3b100@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20030105032240.GA61720@papagena.rockefeller.edu> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030104201251.029387d0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104112015.026a5530@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104201251.029387d0@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 08:22 PM 1/4/2003, Rahul Siddharthan wrote: >So you disassembled and examined it? Or did you benchmark it? Actually, both. In heavy matrix math (with lots of determinants, inversions, etc.), Intel beats GCC by a mile. Ditto on "bit-banging" (bit manipulation, especially for graphics). Didn't disassemble the code, though; just asked the compilers to output assembler. The GCC output was so naive it made me wince. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20030104202908.03c3b100>