Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 19:15:27 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>, Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, David Xu <bsddiy@21cn.com> Subject: Re: vm balance Message-ID: <40677.987614127@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 18 Apr 2001 10:02:04 PDT." <200104181702.f3IH24s23282@earth.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200104181702.f3IH24s23282@earth.backplane.com>, Matt Dillon writes: > If this will get rid of or clean up the specfs garbage, then I'm all > for it. I would love to see a 'clean' fileops based device interface. specfs, aliased vnodes, you name it... I think the aliased vnodes is the single most strong argument of them all for doing this... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40677.987614127>