Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 10:07:26 +0300 From: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi> To: Thomas Hurst <tom.hurst@clara.net> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is MySQL nearly twice as fast on Linux? Message-ID: <40B19F2E.8010804@he.iki.fi> In-Reply-To: <20040524003505.GB2713@voi.aagh.net> References: <5.2.0.9.2.20040521154458.01627688@127.0.0.1> <5.2.0.9.2.20040521154458.01627688@127.0.0.1> <5.2.0.9.2.20040522052606.0156fd70@mail.ojoink.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20040522100318.01598f50@mail.ojoink.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20040522135338.0158cc50@mail.ojoink.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20040523090659.01628af8@mail.ojoink.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20040523102747.015557e8@mail.ojoink.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20040523104834.01465598@mail.ojoink.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20040523114544.014d8150@mail.ojoink.com> <40B13BB3.3030807@freebsd.org> <20040524003505.GB2713@voi.aagh.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thomas Hurst wrote: > >Only if you're only using one table. While this is true in this >benchmark, it isn't really relevent because we're only testing selects, >which are pure reads. There should be no table locking getting in the >way; Linux's performance would seem to confirm this. > > > I changed the test to use InnoDB table type and saw 50% performance improvement. Pete
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40B19F2E.8010804>