Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 18:05:55 +0400 From: Denis Peplin <den@FreeBSD.org> To: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: TCP Wrappers section (handbook/security): services is not daemons Message-ID: <416FD943.2050302@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20041015092936.52851473@localhost> References: <416E4DFD.3040203@FreeBSD.org> <20041014102459.GD799@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20041014092213.22d6914d@localhost> <416E8491.8080500@FreeBSD.org> <20041014101233.399d4b40@localhost> <416E8CD3.9070700@FreeBSD.org> <416F9BE5.5020403@FreeBSD.org> <20041015100829.GG1099@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <416FA795.3020800@FreeBSD.org> <20041015092936.52851473@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello! Tom Rhodes wrote: > On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 14:33:57 +0400 > Denis Peplin <den@freebsd.org> wrote: > > >>Hello! >> >>Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> >>>On 2004-10-15 13:44, Denis Peplin <den@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Hello! >>>> >>>>I have patch for this issue (attached), and keramida help >>>>me to fix it English form. >>>> >>>>log: >>>>Obtain some information from inetd(8) to fix "inetd" >>>>description in network-servers chapter. >>>>Add note about "daemon" term to "tcpwrappers" section >>>>of security chapter. >>> >>> >>>Ah, now that I see the log message... >>> >>>These two are really separate, a bit unrelated changes. If you do >>>commit the change to security/chapter.sgml do it in a second commit. >>>This way the CVS log entry of each file contains text that is relevant >>>to that file and not to some other, random stuff. >> >>ok, not a problem :) > > > I just don't like to see a ton of note this and note that > throughout the handbook. It looks rather ugly and is overused > in many cases as a replacement for rewriting the section to > conform to all releases. It's so much easier, IMO, to tag the > handbook; however, that is not a fight I can win here. > I hope, this is not fight with me :) [attempt to joke above] Yes, it so hard to fix all things, that really ugly. As translator, I work with huge amount of text from handbook, and some parts of it near to "too bad to translate". But it is at least better than nothing :) And, of course, you can commit another solution for issues, discussed in this topic, w/o asking me. > Please consider my rant as 'approved' so long as you do the > separation requested by Giorgos; I agree with him here. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?416FD943.2050302>