Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:25:42 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@DeepCore.dk> To: Thomas Quinot <thomas@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: atapicam(4) as KLD? Message-ID: <4174B366.9010508@DeepCore.dk> In-Reply-To: <20041018234324.GA1270@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> References: <20041013205141.GA874@galgenberg.net> <416DA856.9040703@vbservices.net> <20041015093908.GA11176@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <20041018234324.GA1270@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thomas Quinot wrote: > * Thomas Quinot, 2004-10-15 : >=20 >=20 >>I'll investigate the feasability of that. >=20 >=20 > OK, I have a NEWBUSified atapicam that can be used as a kernel loadable= > module available for testing. Please retrieve the patch from: > http://thomas.quinot.org/atapicam/atapicam-NEWBUS-20041019.diff >=20 > Feedback appreciated. :) Well, if we need to go the newbus way, we need to do it completely, ie=20 get the ATA devices etc tied in that way as well. So in order to get this "official" it needs to be completed first, I=20 know there has been a couble of others looking into this, so now is the=20 time to chime in if thats the case. --=20 -S=F8ren
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4174B366.9010508>