Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:57:42 -0800 From: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> To: Mark Murray <markm@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Adding standalone RSA code Message-ID: <41B9D586.5070403@wadham.ox.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <200412101014.iBAAEict086798@grovel.grondar.org> References: <200412101014.iBAAEict086798@grovel.grondar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Murray wrote: > 240k is not a big binary, and it sounds like your applet is one that > may get heavy use. Unless you have a different definition of "heavy use" than me, no. I don't intend to replace openssl; I want some code for occasional high security purposes -- like verifying the integrity of binary security patches. > Is size really a concern? No. The size is a side-effect of having a minimal, highly secure, library, and was not a design consideration. Colin Percival
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41B9D586.5070403>