Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:49:01 +0200 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MySQL benchmarks Message-ID: <420BBAAD.4030109@portaone.com> In-Reply-To: <420BB5E3.1080504@elischer.org> References: <20050209205943.34c39e15.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <420A838B.9050600@portaone.com> <420BB5E3.1080504@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote: > > > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >> The difference between linux and everything else in those tests is so >> significant even on UP, so that I suspect that something wrong with >> the approach. > > > > no, I believe it to be accurate. however Mysql in default config is very > well > tuned for Linux, and you have to admit that 2.6 is a very nice kernel in > some ways. Actually article shows that there is very little difference between 2.4 and 2.6 even on SMP, which makes me very suspicious, as 2.4 employ the same giant lock model as FreeBSD 4.11 does. -Maxim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?420BBAAD.4030109>