Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 21:22:42 -0500 From: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> To: yfyoufeng@263.net Cc: FreeBSD Clustering List <freeBSD-Cluster@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Clustering wishlist - Was: Introduction & RE:Clustering with Freebsd Message-ID: <428803F2.5060000@centtech.com> In-Reply-To: <1116208152.3929.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <3EA9E48804411F41941A18169042D10401469D@omega3.ebaseweb.com> <1115864757.3938.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4282D173.1040805@centtech.com> <1116148430.3920.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> <428716C2.6090307@buz.ch> <42879B35.6020307@centtech.com> <1116208152.3929.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
yf-263 wrote: > 在 2005-05-15日的 13:55 -0500，Eric Anderson写道： > >>Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: >> >>>yf-263 wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>在 2005-05-11三的 22:45 -0500，Eric Anderson写道： >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Ok - I'm changing the subject here in an attempt to gather information. >>>>> >>>>>Here's my wishlist: >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>As for your wishlists, how about the MogileFS of >>>>http://www.danga.com/mogilefs/ >>>> >>>>And what do you think about our GoogleFS like && MogileFS features >>>>Clustre FS ? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>>"Yes, this means your application has to specifically use a MogileFS >>>client library to store and retrieve files." >>> >>>I don't call that a filesystem, really. Stuff like this has its uses, >>>but for general use, you need something that's entirely transparent to >>>the app. >> >> >>I agree. It has to look and feel like an OS to my apps. I need to NFS >>share it to systems so they can access it as NFS clients. Besides, > > > For our FS in the paper now only ;), you need no NFS. As two years > before, I have implemented a NFS like server in userspace, and a NFS > like client (kernel module) for Linux, AIX, and Solaris, which has been > saled to a big user two years ago. I can bring it onto various platform, > so no NFS is need;) Are you the one that has written the paper, and developed the code? It appears as a regular filesystem to apps? >>MogileFS doesn't even sound like a filesystem: > > > Maybe I should add the missing one, we want to supply the MogileFS > features in our FS. >> From the website: >>================ >>MogileFS is not: >> >> * POSIX Compliant -- you don't run regular Unix applications or >>databases against MogileFS. It's meant for archiving write-once files >>and doing only sequential reads. (though you can modify a file by way of >>overwriting it with a new version) >>================ >> >>As far as your clustre fs goes, I need to see more info. You mentioned >>it's wonderful features to me, but I'd like to see a website to read > > > We are consideration and prepare for that. And now we are gathering and > proof our concepts. > > Last quarter we got some initial idea about it, and this quarter we will > put our first module within that onto our product environment to proof > its right or not. If we succeed, I will try to open it to get a > worldwide improvement :) What company/organization do you work for? Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology A lost ounce of gold may be found, a lost moment of time never. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?428803F2.5060000>