Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 07:17:53 +0200 From: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches) Message-ID: <42940A81.1030801@incubus.de> In-Reply-To: <20050525050943.GA64320@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050524201942.GA28257@xor.obsecurity.org> <42938D40.1050502@incubus.de> <20050524202647.GA28322@xor.obsecurity.org> <4293A18F.6080200@incubus.de> <20050524221454.GA56421@xor.obsecurity.org> <4293F4D9.90204@incubus.de> <84dead7205052420503fded0e9@mail.gmail.com> <4293FD27.90500@incubus.de> <20050525042706.GA60021@xor.obsecurity.org> <4294054C.9080207@incubus.de> <20050525050943.GA64320@xor.obsecurity.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Kris Kennaway wrote: >>I've now disabled the sound chip in the BIOS, no change. > But is the driver still attaching? No, and I now have disabled loading the module at boot aswell. Still no difference. I would also think that if that were the cause, the situation would be a lot worse on the notebook, where a lot more devices share one interrupt. But on the notebook (much slower machine), it isn't quite as bad as on the desktop machine. mkb.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42940A81.1030801>