Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:29:32 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> To: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dangerous situation with shutdown process Message-ID: <42D80E9C.70607@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20050715191412.GA1374@drjekyll.mkbuelow.net> References: <42D6B117.5080302@plab.ku.dk> <20050714191449.A8A615D07@ptavv.es.net> <20050714195253.GA23666@drjekyll.mkbuelow.net> <20050715185413.GI37261@funkthat.com> <20050715191412.GA1374@drjekyll.mkbuelow.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthias Buelow wrote: > John-Mark Gurney wrote: [ ... ] > Why am I arguing in an uphill battle here? Is data safety no longer > important to the FreeBSD community? Such issues should not even > have to be discussed at all! You ask a good question: so, just why are *you* arguing? [1] If "sysctl hw.ata.wc=0" doesn't do what you want, please submit a PR containing something better. Or buy SCSI hardware and a real, battery-backed up RAID system, or fibre-channel, or Firewire, or whatever floats your boat. -- -Chuck [1]: After all, generally it takes at least two people to argue, although some people manage to argue even with themselves. :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42D80E9C.70607>