Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 18:16:54 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@haven.freebsd.dk> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: build option survey Message-ID: <42ECEB66.3050303@portaone.com> In-Reply-To: <10379.1122816227@phk.freebsd.dk> References: <10379.1122816227@phk.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It probably makes sense to sort the list by number of Blocks or by number of Files. -Maxim Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > I'm working on a script which will survey the various build options > (NO_FOO, NO_BAR etc) and what their impact is on the installed system > footprint. > > http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/kernel_options/HTML/ > > The table shows size of the total installworld image, including > the GENERIC kernel. > > Delta is the number of blocks compared to a full installworld, and > no, I'm not quite sure yet why some of them take more space. > > Number of extra files and number of eliminated files (these link > to a "mtree -f -f" output file so you can see which they were. > > When done chewing, all the options will be tested for their effect > during "installworld only", "buildworld only" and "build+installworld" > usage. > > When completed, this script will end up under src/tools/tools > > Poul-Henning > > PS: Interestingly, this survey has theological implications as well > as it proves the long held belief that C++ is evil: The NO_CXX > option which prevents the installation of this evilness eliminates > exactly 666 files :-) >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42ECEB66.3050303>