Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 01 Oct 2005 16:31:45 +0200
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de>
To:        Freddie Cash <fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca>
Cc:        freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Which MySQL version best to use and with/without linux threads?
Message-ID:  <433E9DD1.90900@cs.tu-berlin.de>
In-Reply-To: <200509300925.38171.fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca>
References:  <ED4C536E-48C1-11D9-B2C4-000A2791B6EC@illusionart.com>	<1102494183.41b6b9e726b2f@www.domainfactory-webmail.de>	<433D3C12.6020104@axis.nl> <200509300925.38171.fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Freddie Cash wrote:

> Scott Long and Kris Kenneway ran various benchmarks back in the early 
> 5.x days comparing MySQL 4 compiled with LinuxThreads, libc_r, libkse 
> (the default threading library on 5.x and 6.x), and libthr.  In almost 
> all cases, libkse was just as faster or faster than LinuxThreads.

Do you have a reference? I couldn't reproduce this conclusion.

Björn



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?433E9DD1.90900>