Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:58:43 +0300 From: Pertti Kosunen <pertti.kosunen@pp.nic.fi> To: ferdinand.goldmann@jku.at Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dummynet, em driver, device polling issues :-(( Message-ID: <4343CE03.7090008@pp.nic.fi> In-Reply-To: <4343C559.5000000@jku.at> References: <4341089F.7010504@jku.at> <20051003104548.GB70355@cell.sick.ru> <4341242F.9060602@jku.at> <20051003123210.GF70355@cell.sick.ru> <43426EF3.3020404@jku.at> <9CD8C672-1EF2-42FE-A61E-83DC684C893D@dragondata.com> <43429157.90606@jku.at> <4342987D.7000200@benswebs.com> <20051004161217.GB43195@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <1128470191.75484.TMDA@seddon.ca> <979B163D-7078-4558-9095-DC329707A5B4@dragondata.com> <4343C559.5000000@jku.at>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Ferdinand Goldmann wrote: > 944mbps is a very good value, anyway. What we see in our setup are > throuput rates around 300mbps or below. When testing with tcpspray, > throughput hardly exceeded 13MB/s. Increasing MTU should help to get better results, as long all devices in network support jumbo frames (at least on large files). 9k or even 16k might be supported.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4343CE03.7090008>