Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 06 Oct 2005 18:13:49 -0500
From:      Greg Barniskis <nalists@scls.lib.wi.us>
To:        Dan Ponte <dcp1990@neptune.atopia.net>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: new FreeBSD-webpage
Message-ID:  <4345AFAD.9090004@scls.lib.wi.us>
In-Reply-To: <20051006221820.GB38659@neptune.atopia.net>
References:  <b41c75520510060225h2eeecdd8w@mail.gmail.com>	<di2s9q$4ss$1@sea.gmane.org> <43455D3E.5040007@mbnet.fi>	<20051006204336.GA36557@neptune.atopia.net>	<43459BEB.2090503@scls.lib.wi.us> <20051006221820.GB38659@neptune.atopia.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dan Ponte wrote:

>>I doubt the primary goal here
>>was to appear trendy.
> 
> 
> Well, it certainly seems as if that was one of the goals, seeing how the
> new site uses quite a few new webdesign concepts that came into
> existence in the past few years, while providing little benefit in the
> way of content or usability.

well, usability is not an entirely objective measure, but there are 
objective aspects to it. Like, not having to scroll to find crucial 
navigation links and the Search box, or to see what the latest 
security advisory was. Like, reducing 20-30 headings in big "stacks" 
to clearly bounded clusters of "7 +/- 2", fostering rapid 
understanding. I think usability is measurably up.

I suppose in sense it does break down in a way that the old site was 
"more usable" for experts (usable once one had studied on it awhile, 
that is), while the new layout might be more usable for newbies. But 
that doesn't mean it was "for newbies". I like it, and I've been 
poking at the web site for a decade now. I was put off for maybe 15 
secs the first time I looked at it, then I started to accept and 
appreciate (aw, who can resist that big smilin' Beastie ;).

It's got some quirks. I'm seeing some more things suffer from fixed 
widths (and fixed heights, like the mirror selector widget -- px is 
just not the most user-friendly unit of measure), but the path it's 
on seems a good one. Like Kris said, if you've got a specific 
problem, constructively suggest a specific solution (other than just 
reverting).


-- 
Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator
South Central Library System (SCLS)
Library Interchange Network (LINK)
<gregb at scls.lib.wi.us>, (608) 266-6348



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4345AFAD.9090004>