Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Apr 1998 20:48:24 +0200
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net>
Cc:        Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Harlan Stenn <Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: bin/6353 
Message-ID:  <4382.893270904@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 22 Apr 1998 14:24:36 EDT." <Pine.BSF.3.96.980422142400.523z-100000@sasami.jurai.net> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.3.96.980422142400.523z-100000@sasami.jurai.net>, "Matthew N. Dodd" writes:
>On Wed, 22 Apr 1998, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>> Strongly disagree.  Every NFS system out there comes with an
>> automounter of some sort or another.  Most of them come with Sun's
>> broken automount(8), for which the source is thankfully unavailable.
>> amd is an important, fundamental part of an NFS implementation (and
>> one which we may need to hack at times in order to reflect changes in
>> our kernel code).
>
>It looks like am-utils and amd are the same thing, a few years removed
>from eachother.  I don't see what the problem is.

The question is, should it be a port or should it be contrib ?

I guess we should leave this to whoever submits either of these first :-)

--
Poul-Henning Kamp             FreeBSD coreteam member
phk@FreeBSD.ORG               "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
"Drink MONO-tonic, it goes down but it will NEVER come back up!"

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4382.893270904>