Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Nov 2005 00:16:04 -0500
From:      "Russell E. Meek" <russell@russellmeek.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SCHED_ULE Scheduler FreeBSD 6 - Release
Message-ID:  <43854C94.6040206@russellmeek.net>
In-Reply-To: <20051124024033.GB13075@xor.obsecurity.org>
References:  <4384E8F6.6070308@russellmeek.net> <20051124024033.GB13075@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote:

>On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:11:02PM -0500, Russell Meek wrote:
>  
>
>>Is anyone here currently using the *SCHED_ULE* scheduler in a server 
>>enviroment, production or non?
>>
>>Pros?  Cons?
>>    
>>
>
>This question has been asked quite often, so you would have done well
>to research the answer before asking :) 
>
>It's slower on the workloads I've tested and is not stable on machines
>with many CPUs (e.g. 12).
>
>Kris
>  
>
Kris,

This question has been asked quite often, so you would have done well
to research the answer before asking  :) 

Shitty remark, not wise to jump to conclusions.


Common Sense would dictate that it would be highly retarded for me to 
ask a question that I have not at least ever so slightly attempted to 
look into.

so you would have done well to research the answer before asking


I see you agree


google.com/bsd is a trusted friend, however not much out there on 
performance states between 4BSD and SCHED_ULE on FreeBSD 6 Release.

It's slower on the workloads I've tested and is not stable on machines
with many CPUs (e.g. 12).


That is all I needed. Thanks again for the response.

Russell



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43854C94.6040206>