Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 02 Dec 2005 15:10:19 +0100
From:      "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.uni-mainz.de>
To:        Nathan Vidican <nvidican@wmptl.com>
Cc:        amd64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Tyan alternatives cuz their support totally sucks
Message-ID:  <439055CB.2030403@mail.uni-mainz.de>
In-Reply-To: <4390488A.9060708@wmptl.com>
References:  <20051201172828.5b25fdd4.kgunders@teamcool.net> <4390488A.9060708@wmptl.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

>> Requirements:
>>
>> 1) Single Opteron should suffice
>> 2) DDR400 ECC supported
>> 3) SATA disk subsystem will suffice 2 drive gmirror conf.  4 drive
>> would be bonus.  SATA-II (or 3.0 I guess they're calling it now)
>> preferred.

As far as I know, SATA-II is NOT SATA 3.0. SATA-II is still SATA 1.0a 
and defines doubling of tranfer rate.

>>
>> All this b.s. w/Tyan has chewed up far too much of my time so I need
>> something that will "just work" and not require any hardware
>> compatibility histrionics.
> 
> I've always had good experiences with MSI boards/systems... generally 
> well priced/featured and their support is pretty good.
>

TYAN is said to be a good choice in building server related systems, 
while MSI is more aimed for the home and office market (I may be wrong).

Oliver




home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?439055CB.2030403>