Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:03:31 -0500 From: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: trustedbsd-audit@TrustedBSD.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= <gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Audit integration into CVS in progress, some tree disruption Message-ID: <43E14C53.3060400@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <20060201222704.G87763@fledge.watson.org> References: <20060201221213.L87763@fledge.watson.org> <43E134AB.8000600@t-hosting.hu> <20060201222704.G87763@fledge.watson.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Robert Watson wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Kövesdán Gábor wrote: > >> Do you plan to merge it to RELENG_6? If so, when? Maybe for the >> upcoming 6.1? Or only for 6.2 or later? > > It depends a bit how well this shakes out. The code is definitely > still "experimental", in that the set of events audited is not yet > complete. There are three general sorts of weaknesses in the set of > events currently audited: > With all this in mind, it is not yet ruled out that we could ship > initial "experimental" audit support in 6.1-RELEASE. In fact, the > timing is currently such that it will be possible, assuming all goes > well, and allowing for the fact that it really will be an experimental > feature and not production feature in 6.1. We were quite careful to > merge the necessary ABI changes to RELENG_6 before the 6.0 release so > that merging it would be possible without breaking existing 6.x device > drivers. Personally, i would like to see less "experimental" code in 6.1. Perhaps it would be better to wait until everyone feels the code is ready?home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43E14C53.3060400>
