Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:17:24 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> Cc: current@freebsd.org, cokane@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module Message-ID: <44008314.8030205@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <20060225140509.GC79616@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <20060225140509.GC79616@comp.chem.msu.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yar Tikhiy wrote: > Hi there, > > In the course of reviewing and cleaning up the default configuration > of kernel options, it was suggested by the Release Engineers that > we had a separate module for TDFX_LINUX instead of placing the > burden on the device tdfx and module 3dfx. Could anybody interested > test this change? I've made sure it builds, but I have no 3dfx hw > to really test it. The testing is as simple as building the new > 3dfx and 3dfx_linux modules, loading them, and verifying that the > linux apps work with the device as before. Thanks in advance! > Why keep the TDFX_LINUX option defined in sys/conf/options? Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44008314.8030205>