Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:40:53 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: heavy NFS writes lead to corrup summary in superblock Message-ID: <4489C0B5.3010902@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <200606091333.42619.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> References: <20060609065656.31225.qmail@web30313.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200606091313.04913.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <4489AF86.2080901@centtech.com> <200606091333.42619.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Mikhail Teterin wrote: > п'ятниця 09 червень 2006 13:27, Eric Anderson написав: > >>Just curious - what NFS mount options are being used, > > > The fs is accessed by the remote client machines (mostly -- Solaris) via > automounters -- with the default parameters. > > >>and are you changing any sysctl's (vfs/nfs related)? > > > No, should I? > > -mi Well, before we get too far off on tangents, would you mind running dumpfs on the filesystem and posting the first block of information? Scotthome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4489C0B5.3010902>