Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:02:04 +0200
From:      Fredrik Lindberg <fli+freebsd-net@shapeshifter.se>
To:        Pat Lashley <patl@volant.org>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Zeroconfig and Multicast DNS
Message-ID:  <44EDDB8C.9090504@shapeshifter.se>
In-Reply-To: <7CC9AC69410B69EBD31122E4@garrett.local>
References:  <DD49A62B2AB4E38804FB10B6@garrett.local> <44EA1926.2000501@shapeshifter.se> <9C04919EE684029A410DE208@garrett.local> <44EAC40E.9000904@shapeshifter.se> <3E654CC0217F90E20FCD806E@garrett.local> <44EC90B7.6090908@shapeshifter.se> <44ECB0F2.9040300@FreeBSD.org> <C408C9E0406302DF5EE12E67@garrett.local> <20060823212110.GD27961@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <D6D2605619AD2B0F140F5802@garrett.local> <20060823221835.GA28978@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <23D2619F6BACE4E728178EE5@garrett.local> <44ED3BD1.3030206@shapeshifter.se> <AC5769F16F9730CABCCC4E61@garrett.local> <44EDA9A5.2050108@shapeshifter.se> <BE1059C6974AD43BC382E107@garrett.local> <44EDBDD0.4050000@shapeshifter.se> <7CC9AC69410B69EBD31122E4@garrett.local>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pat Lashley wrote:
> 
> But the whole 'direct communication between LLA and non-LLA on the same 
> link' discussion is really a side issue. It should only come up for us 
> in a scenario where we want to have a completely zeroconf FreeBSD 
> machine (using LLA) in an environment with non-LLA machines. If the 
> FreeBSD machine is getting a static or DHCP address and wants to talk to 
> LLA machines; then it should also also obtain an LLA address as an alias 
> so that it can readily talk to both subnets. (This is one of the reasons 
> that I'm campaigning so strongly for doing the LLA addresses as an alias 
> even if there is some other address available.)
> 

Ok, that was just what I wanted to hear. Seems like we have talked
around each other.

If you want to communicate with an LLA host, fine, obtain an LLA
address otherwise take a hike.
My LLA implementation already does this..it never removes an address
from a interface it didn't set itself, and it always sets address
as aliases. There is also an option to force it to assign
(as an alias) a LLA address even if the interface is already is
configured with another address.

Fredrik Lindberg




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44EDDB8C.9090504>