Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:40:16 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS Message-ID: <44F362C0.6080309@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20060828195339.GF37035@funkthat.com> References: <44EF6E18.6090905@elischer.org> <44F3429F.6050204@FreeBSD.org> <44F344FA.1000408@elischer.org> <20060828195339.GF37035@funkthat.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
John-Mark Gurney wrote: >Julian Elischer wrote this message on Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 12:33 -0700: > > >>ALmost all other services (e.g. inetd,natd,sshd, etc.etc.) allow you to >>specify a different config file >>so that you can supply different services to theinside and outside but >>it all falls appart >>if they still are forced to use the same DNS server and can not provide >>a differentiated service >>for that reason. >> >> > >Why not put one of the two in side a jail (I think someone else mentioned >this), or chroot'd environment where it can pick up a different resolv.conf? > > > The very mail you quoted says that I can not put it inside a jail. a chroot is slightly less problematical except that they do need to share filesystems. To make it fully work I need to have /etc nearly all shared along with a lot more but I need to have different /etc/resolv.conf so, Why NOT make this tunable from the environment? it does not do it for SUID processes and there are already environment varables that influence name lookup.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44F362C0.6080309>