Date: 09 Feb 2006 09:04:05 -0500 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th> Cc: ianchov@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mail back-up system Message-ID: <44irrozl0q.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <200602090910.k199AKB6011124@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> References: <200602090700.k1970DiJ095554@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <18e02bd30602090026h2e297677sc6742cbb653aede5@mail.gmail.com> <200602090910.k199AKB6011124@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th> writes: > > I read the article and the idea is good. But i would like to know what MTA > > are you using..In the paper you said that at first the email is strored in > > Mailbox format. Isn`t that a bottleneck. WHat are the loads of the machines= > > Considering we have only 200 users and 3000 messages per day, whatever > would do. > > MTA is sendmail/milter. > > I plan to change that mailbox thing when I get budget for a new > machine to play with (I don't want to take the risk to break the > working configuration). Mailbox format might not be a bottleneck in this application. It's fairly efficient at appending new messages, and that is the only common operation being performed on these backup mail spools.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44irrozl0q.fsf>