Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:01:54 -0500 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: Baho Utot <baho-utot@columbus.rr.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of portmaster Message-ID: <44shneot7h.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <945f6d92-6834-7e2c-18c4-0a17e2c04122@columbus.rr.com> (Baho Utot's message of "Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:04:16 -0500") References: <CAB88xy_RU5TTE=pcsjCWsxWyU-jP91qzD9S-R1v6GKGHJg2=nQ@mail.gmail.com> <945f6d92-6834-7e2c-18c4-0a17e2c04122@columbus.rr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Baho Utot <baho-utot@columbus.rr.com> writes: > On 02/16/17 06:08, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: >> I'm looking for constructive critics, feedbacks, anything that can >> help me to make portmaster an actively maintained and used tool. > > If you can have it build in a clean chroot or jail then you'll get my > attention What kind of special support? I use it with a chroot that mounts /usr/ports (and src) read-only, and aside from the initial base system install, it took about fifteen minutes to set up.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44shneot7h.fsf>