Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 08:28:38 -0500 From: Randall Stewart <rrs@cisco.com> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCTP is in the Tree :-) Message-ID: <45532D06.2010203@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <20061109115246.GA55317@rambler-co.ru> References: <45524517.1060501@cisco.com> <20061109115246.GA55317@rambler-co.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 03:59:03PM -0500, Randall Stewart wrote: > >>Project plans: >> >> - Debug/debug debug :-) >> - Continuted code improvements >> - Performance improvements if we can :-) >> - Continue to support a multi-platform >> stack for MAC-OS X/NetBSD/FreeBSD6.x >> and other platforms. >> - Add appropriate features (in the future). >> > > An sctp(4) manpage similar to tcp(4) would be in order. > > Or is there some other place (don't mention code, it's > scary for its 54k+ lines ;-) where the socket SCTP API > is currently documented? > > > Cheers, If you look on one of my postings.. I actually want to verify where to place man pages.. I don't have a sctp(4).. which is a GREAT idea.. But I do have sctp_sendmsg(2) sctp_recvmsg(2) sctp_send(2) And maybe one other that I am not remembering this early without a cup of coffee.. Can I just put these in the doc tree under man2.. and man4 (assuming I write sctp(4))? (after of course getting gnn's approval).. or is there some other process to check documents in? R -- Randall Stewart NSSTG - Cisco Systems Inc. 803-345-0369 <or> 803-317-4952 (cell)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45532D06.2010203>